Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 20.0 points higher (55.1 vs 35.1) but costs 5.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $614; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 35.1, and Grok 4.6 (Low) when 35.1 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 55.1 | +57.0% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 57.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $3,117.31 | +407.8% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 5.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.36s | 42.64s | +219.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 219.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 57.0% more intelligence, 407.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 219.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill