Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Low) scores 9.9 points higher (35.1 vs 25.2) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($614 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 25.2 | −28.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 28.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $427.73 | −30.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 30.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.64s | 47.00s | +244.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 244.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 28.2% less intelligence, 30.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 244.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill