Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) scores 20.1 points higher (44.2 vs 24.1) but costs 4.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2242 vs $502; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 24.1, and Solar Mini 4 when 24.1 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 24.1 | −45.5% Solar Mini 4 is 45.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,241.91 | $502.02 | −77.6% Solar Mini 4 is 77.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.53s | 25.33s | −30.7% Solar Mini 4 is 30.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh): 45.5% less intelligence, 77.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill