Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 6.0 points higher (52.4 vs 46.4) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $4967; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.4 | 52.4 | +12.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 12.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,967.35 | $5,786.78 | +16.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 16.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.66s | 40.70s | +14.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 14.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh): 12.9% more intelligence, 16.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 14.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill