Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 0.7 points higher (26.0 vs 25.3) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $150; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Hy3.
| Metric | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 26.0 | +2.8% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 2.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $231.08 | +54.5% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 54.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.29s | 49.36s | +48.3% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 48.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Hy3: 2.8% more intelligence, 54.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Hy3MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill