Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 14.0 points higher (55.1 vs 41.1) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $1015; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 41.1, and Ling 3.1 Flash when 41.1 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 41.1 | −25.4% Ling 3.1 Flash is 25.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $1,014.56 | −67.5% Ling 3.1 Flash is 67.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.53s | 13.61s | −70.8% Ling 3.1 Flash is 70.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 25.4% less intelligence, 67.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Ling 3.1 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.1 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill