Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 25.6 points higher (55.1 vs 29.5) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $2277; both flagship class). Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Max.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 29.5 | −46.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 46.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $2,277.12 | −27.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 27.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.55s | 16.62s | −66.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 66.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 46.5% less intelligence, 27.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 66.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill