Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 1.2 points higher (43.9 vs 42.7) but costs 5.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1552 vs $283; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when you need intelligence above 42.7, and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when 42.7 is enough.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 42.7 | −2.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,551.81 | $283.18 | −81.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 81.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 22.73s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 2.7% less intelligence, 81.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill