Llama 4 Scout vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Llama 4 Scout scores 0.5 points higher (6.5 vs 6.0) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($73.6 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick Llama 4 Scout when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ministral 3 14B.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 6.0 | −7.7% Ministral 3 14B is 7.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $37.56 | −48.9% Ministral 3 14B is 48.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.84s | 8.02s | +37.3% Ministral 3 14B is 37.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Llama 4 Scout: 7.7% less intelligence, 48.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Llama 4 ScoutMinistral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill