Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 20.0 points higher (26.5 vs 6.5) but costs 3.9× as much to run the benchmark ($286 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 26.5 | +307.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $286.07 | +288.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 3.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.84s | 6.31s | +8.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 8.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Llama 4 Scout: 307.7% more intelligence, 288.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Llama 4 ScoutNemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill