Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 18.7 points higher (25.2 vs 6.5) but costs 5.8× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 25.2 | +287.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 3.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $427.73 | +481.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 5.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.99s | 47.00s | +841.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 841.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Llama 4 Scout: 287.7% more intelligence, 481.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 841.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Llama 4 ScoutQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill