Llama 4 Scout vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Mini 4 scores 17.6 points higher (24.1 vs 6.5) but costs 6.8× as much to run the benchmark ($502 vs $73.6; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Solar Mini 4 when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 24.1 | +270.8% Solar Mini 4 is 3.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $502.02 | +582.5% Solar Mini 4 is 6.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.00s | 25.33s | +406.6% Solar Mini 4 is 406.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Llama 4 Scout: 270.8% more intelligence, 582.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 406.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Llama 4 ScoutSolar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill