Mercury 2 vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Mercury 2 by Inception or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 vs Mercury 2: 101.9% more intelligence, 41.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 600.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 10.8 | 21.8 | +101.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 2.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $104.94 | $61.93 | −41.0% MiMo-V2.5 is 41.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.65s | 46.61s | +600.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 600.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.75 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mercury 2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Mercury 2MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill