Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Mercury 2 by Inception or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 14.4 points higher (25.2 vs 10.8) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $105; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Mercury 2 when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | Mercury 2 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 10.8 | 25.2 | +133.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $104.94 | $427.73 | +307.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 4.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.65s | 46.21s | +594.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 594.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.75 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Mercury 2: 133.3% more intelligence, 307.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 594.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mercury 2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Mercury 2Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill