MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 24.5 points higher (46.3 vs 21.8) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $61.9; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 46.3 | +112.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $206.66 | +233.7% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.61s | 46.84s | +0.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 0.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2.5: 112.4% more intelligence, 233.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 0.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill