MiMo-V2.5 vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5 scores 14.7 points higher (21.8 vs 7.1) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($61.9 vs $27.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick MiMo-V2.5 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Small 3.1.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 7.1 | −67.4% Mistral Small 3.1 is 67.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $27.82 | −55.1% Mistral Small 3.1 is 55.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 53.92s | 11.25s | −79.1% Mistral Small 3.1 is 79.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.1 vs MiMo-V2.5: 67.4% less intelligence, 55.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
MiMo-V2.5Mistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill