MiMo-V2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 4.7 points higher (26.5 vs 21.8) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($286 vs $61.9; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 26.5 | +21.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 21.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $286.07 | +361.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 4.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 66.80s | 6.31s | −90.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 90.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs MiMo-V2.5: 21.6% more intelligence, 361.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill