MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 14.2 points higher (40.2 vs 26.0) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $231; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 40.2 | +54.6% Qwen3.8 Max is 54.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $3,172.37 | +1272.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 14× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.64s | 64.64s | +30.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 30.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 54.6% more intelligence, 1272.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill