MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 4.8 points higher (42.7 vs 37.9) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $110; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 42.7 | +12.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 12.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $283.18 | +158.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.63s | 23.52s | −51.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 51.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 12.7% more intelligence, 158.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill