MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 45.6% less intelligence, 107.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 25.2 | −45.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 45.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $427.73 | +107.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 44.97s | 46.20s | +2.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
MiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill