MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 16.2 points higher (42.7 vs 26.5) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $283; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.7 | 26.5 | −37.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 37.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $283.18 | $282.51 | −0.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 0.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.63s | 6.33s | −70.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 70.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: 37.9% less intelligence, 0.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/minimax-m3-1-flash/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill