Mistral Large 3 vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 3 by Mistral or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 3 scores 2.2 points higher (9.3 vs 7.1) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($46.4 vs $27.8; both budget class). Pick Mistral Large 3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Small 3.1.
| Metric | Mistral Large 3 | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 7.1 | −23.7% Mistral Small 3.1 is 23.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $46.41 | $27.82 | −40.1% Mistral Small 3.1 is 40.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.17s | 11.78s | +64.3% Mistral Small 3.1 is 64.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $1.50 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Mistral Large 3: 23.7% less intelligence, 40.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Mistral Large 3Mistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-3/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill