Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 8.1 points higher (38.4 vs 30.3) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $319; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 30.3, and Beam 1.0 when 30.3 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.4 | 30.3 | −21.1% Beam 1.0 is 21.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,607.86 | $318.73 | −80.2% Beam 1.0 is 80.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.12s | 8.02s | −70.4% Beam 1.0 is 70.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.36 / $4.18 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 21.1% less intelligence, 80.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill