Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Mistral Medium 3.5: 180.3% more intelligence, 71.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 182.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.2 | 39.8 | +180.3% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,263.80 | $362.72 | −71.3% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 71.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.90s | 50.49s | +182.1% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 182.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $7.50 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Mistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill