Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 15.2 points higher (26.5 vs 11.3) but costs 6.7× as much to run the benchmark ($286 vs $42.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when you need intelligence above 11.3, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when 11.3 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.3 | 26.5 | +134.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $42.50 | $286.07 | +573.1% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 6.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.50s | 6.35s | −56.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 56.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning): 134.5% more intelligence, 573.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill