Muse Ember (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Muse Ember (Max) by Meta or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 0.6 points higher (36.6 vs 36.0) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($1906 vs $117; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 36.0, and Muse Ember (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Ember (Max) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 36.6 | +1.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 1.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $117.12 | $1,905.84 | +1527.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 16× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 43.16s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Muse Ember (Max): 1.7% more intelligence, 1527.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Muse Ember (Max)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill