Muse Ember (Max) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Muse Ember (Max) by Meta or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 7.6 points higher (43.6 vs 36.0) but costs 46× as much to run the benchmark ($5414 vs $117; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 36.0, and Muse Ember (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Ember (Max) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 43.6 | +21.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 21.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $117.12 | $5,414.45 | +4523.0% Muse Wonder (Max) is 46× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 49.50s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Muse Ember (Max): 21.1% more intelligence, 4523.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
Muse Ember (Max)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill