Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 31.8 points higher (39.6 vs 7.8) but costs 8.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.6 | 7.8 | −80.3% Solar Pro 3 is 80.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,385.40 | $159.22 | −88.5% Solar Pro 3 is 88.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.85s | 18.89s | −9.4% Solar Pro 3 is 9.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh): 80.3% less intelligence, 88.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 9.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill