Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning by NVIDIA or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 1.6% less intelligence, 152.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 160.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.9 | 12.7 | −1.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 1.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $92.58 | $233.56 | +152.3% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.73s | 22.73s | +160.4% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 160.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.06 / $0.20 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-lightning/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-lightning/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill