Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 3.8 points higher (30.3 vs 26.5) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $286; both mid-range class). Pick Beam 1.0 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.
| Metric | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.5 | 30.3 | +14.3% Beam 1.0 is 14.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $286.07 | $318.73 | +11.4% Beam 1.0 is 11.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.37s | 7.58s | +19.0% Beam 1.0 is 19.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.23 / $0.57 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 14.3% more intelligence, 11.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill