Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.7 Max: 14.2% more intelligence, 41.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 259.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 33.7 | +14.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 14.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,277.12 | $1,336.09 | −41.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 41.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.63s | 59.76s | +259.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 259.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill