Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 20.3 points higher (29.5 vs 9.2) but costs 5.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $405; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 9.2 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 9.2 | −68.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 68.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,277.12 | $405.10 | −82.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 82.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.57s | 6.22s | −62.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 62.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.7 Max: 68.8% less intelligence, 82.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill