Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 24.9 points higher (46.0 vs 21.1) but costs 6.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1559 vs $247; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 21.1, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 21.1 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.0 | 21.1 | −54.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 54.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,559.38 | $247.26 | −84.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 84.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.80s | 6.61s | −60.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 60.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.7 Max: 54.1% less intelligence, 84.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) scores 57.70 for $1543.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill