Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 25.4 points higher (46.7 vs 21.3) but costs 4.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1064 vs $250; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 21.3, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 21.3 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.7 | 21.3 | −54.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 54.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,063.86 | $250.18 | −76.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 76.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.71s | 4.97s | −70.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 70.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.7 Max: 54.4% less intelligence, 76.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Sol (high) scores 57.30 for $955.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill