Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 19.8 points higher (29.9 vs 10.1) but costs 4.8× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $476; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 10.1, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 10.1 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 10.1 | −66.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 66.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,277.12 | $476.03 | −79.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 79.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.87s | 5.52s | −67.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 67.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.7 Max: 66.2% less intelligence, 79.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Muse Spark 1.3 (max) scores 48.20 for $2000.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill