Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 20.2 points higher (45.4 vs 25.2) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($4935 vs $428; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when you need intelligence above 25.2, and Qwen3.7 Plus when 25.2 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.2 | 45.4 | +80.2% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 80.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $427.73 | $4,934.79 | +1053.7% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.21s | 65.39s | +41.5% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 41.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.7 Plus: 80.2% more intelligence, 1053.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill