Qwen3.7 Plus vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.7 Plus
Ring-2.6-1T vs Qwen3.7 Plus: 34.1% less intelligence, 34.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.2 | 16.6 | −34.1% Ring-2.6-1T is 34.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $427.73 | $575.60 | +34.6% Ring-2.6-1T is 34.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.21s | 24.04s | −48.0% Ring-2.6-1T is 48.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Qwen3.7 PlusRing-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill