Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: 76.9% less intelligence, 11.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 9.2 | −76.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 76.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $362.72 | $405.10 | +11.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 11.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 50.25s | 6.22s | −87.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 87.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.47 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Qwen3.8-Flash-NextQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-flash-next/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-flash-next/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill