Beam 1.0 vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Beam 1.0 by Reflection or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 22.5 points higher (30.3 vs 7.8) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick Beam 1.0 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | Beam 1.0 | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.3 | 7.8 | −74.3% Solar Pro 3 is 74.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $318.73 | $159.22 | −50.0% Solar Pro 3 is 50.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.58s | 18.88s | +149.1% Solar Pro 3 is 149.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Beam 1.0: 74.3% less intelligence, 50.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 149.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Beam 1.0Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/reflection-beam/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/reflection-beam/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill