Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs GLM-5.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or GLM-5.3 (Max) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Max) scores 7.7 points higher (31.7 vs 24.0) but costs 8.8× as much to run the benchmark ($3496 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | GLM-5.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 31.7 | +32.1% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 32.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $3,495.62 | +780.9% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 8.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 32.03s | +165.4% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 165.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
GLM-5.3 (Max) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 32.1% more intelligence, 780.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 165.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- GLM-5.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 54.80 for $3204.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGLM-5.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/glm-5-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/glm-5-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill