Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta scores 0.2 points higher (24.0 vs 23.8) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($397 vs $334; both mid-range class). Pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Luna (Max).
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 23.8 | −0.8% GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is 0.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $334.35 | −15.7% GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is 15.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 106.59s | +783.1% GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is 783.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 0.8% less intelligence, 15.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 783.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.40 for $267.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGPT-5.6 Luna (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-5-6-luna · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-5-6-luna?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill