Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 9.7 points higher (33.7 vs 24.0) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($6354 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 33.7 | +40.4% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 40.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $6,353.83 | +1501.1% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 16× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 65.37s | +441.6% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 441.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 40.4% more intelligence, 1501.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 441.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 58.30 for $5903.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaQwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill