Apodex 1.1 vs Claude Opus 5 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Claude Opus 5 (Medium) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Medium) scores 18.4 points higher (44.8 vs 26.4) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($2732 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Claude Opus 5 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 44.8 | +69.7% Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is 69.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $2,731.91 | +190.9% Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is 2.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 12.73s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $5.00 / $25.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Opus 5 (Medium) vs Apodex 1.1: 69.7% more intelligence, 190.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Apodex 1.1Claude Opus 5 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/claude-opus-5-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/claude-opus-5-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill