Apodex 1.1 vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 17.5 points higher (26.4 vs 8.9) but costs 64× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $14.7; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Apodex 1.1 when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 8.9 | −66.3% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 66.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $14.68 | −98.4% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 98.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 57.75s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Apodex 1.1: 66.3% less intelligence, 98.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Apodex 1.1Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill