Apodex 1.1 vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 5.7 points higher (26.4 vs 20.7) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Apodex 1.1 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh).
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 20.7 | −21.6% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 21.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $331.24 | −64.7% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 64.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 53.29s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Apodex 1.1: 21.6% less intelligence, 64.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Apodex 1.1GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill