Apodex 1.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Apodex 1.1: 61.7% more intelligence, 69.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 42.7 | +61.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 61.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $283.18 | −69.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 69.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 22.73s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Apodex 1.1MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill