Apodex 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 3.1 points higher (29.5 vs 26.4) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.7 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 29.5 | +11.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 11.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $2,277.12 | +142.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 16.67s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Apodex 1.1: 11.7% more intelligence, 142.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Apodex 1.1Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill