Apodex 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) scores 1.2 points higher (27.6 vs 26.4) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1165 vs $939; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 27.6 | +4.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 4.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $1,165.00 | +24.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 24.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 56.53s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) vs Apodex 1.1: 4.5% more intelligence, 24.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-8-27b-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-8-27b-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill