Apodex 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 13.8 points higher (40.2 vs 26.4) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 26.4, and Apodex 1.1 when 26.4 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 40.2 | +52.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 52.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $3,172.37 | +237.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 3.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 62.87s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Apodex 1.1: 52.3% more intelligence, 237.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Apodex 1.1Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill