Celeris-1 vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) scores 7.7 points higher (14.0 vs 6.3) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 14.0 | +122.2% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $250.37 | +317.4% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 4.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 5.86s | +573.6% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 573.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Celeris-1: 122.2% more intelligence, 317.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 573.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Celeris-1Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/grok-4-3-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/grok-4-3-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill